Social Missionaries?

I have to say it irritates me no end when I hear people rip I Corinthians 3:5-9 out of context in order to justify disobedience to the Lord. Nowhere in the Bible did he tell us to do good works alone, and to say nothing to people about our need to turn to Christ in repentance and faith. The 'social gospel' is no gospel at all, which means Galatians 1:8-9 is applicable to people who spread it. If that has been you - repent!

If your church has been supporting 'social missionaries' without ever challenging them as to what they think they are playing at, there's a serious problem somewhere.

Some current buzz-words: 'integrated mission', 'holistic mission', 'holistic gospel'

At least some of the people who use the above phrases do not seem to understand the gospel at all. Yes, we SHOULD do good works. But they are not the gospel! People who never proclaim the gospel in clear words, who never call people to repentance and faith in Christ, do NOT have an 'integrated gospel' - they have no gospel at all!

Of course we often miss opportunities to tell others the gospel, or when we attempt to take such opportunities, we fail to discharge our duty as faithfully as we should have done. I'll certainly own up to these failings myself. But the error of people who believe and preach the 'social gospel' is far worse than this, for they turn a fault into a virtue. They make remaining permanently silent about what happened on the cross a strategy to embrace instead of a fault to repent of. The gospel becomes a program of social action instead of what Scripture declares it to be, which is:

  • the reality of our sinful spiritual condition,
  • the news of what God in Christ has done about this, through Christ's life, death and resurrection,
  • that God now commands us to repent and believe in Christ alone for salvation,
  • that God promises salvation for those who turn and believe, and judgement for those who do not.

In essence, THAT is the gospel, and taking it into all the world means VERBALLY PROCLAIMING those truths. It is a totally cross-cultural message, it applies in every place and time, and whilst there is scope for contextualisation in the way you present the message, if you use the 'contextualisation' argument to justify SILENCE, then you are NOT being a missionary of Christ, you are being disobedient to God's word. Paul believed in being all things to all men that he might win some, but he NEVER used that as an excuse for changing the core message above, or for remaining silent about the core message.

back to top